Attributed mentions
3684
Across all collected Hacker News results
Discussion intelligence
A source-linked Hacker News monitor for the tracked company graph. These are attributable public discussions—not sentiment, endorsements, or unverified company facts.
Attributed mentions
3684
Across all collected Hacker News results
Companies represented
14
Exact-name monitor matches only
Collection source
Hacker News
Latest new record seen
Source-backed records
Showing 2801–2820 of 3684 matching discussions
It's hard to think notions like company loyalty have ever meant something in Silicon Valley. Amodei himself would have never subscribed to a "mission" in the entirety of his career, having jumped from Baidu to Google to OpenAI and finally backstabbing them to form their own company. It's all just a performance; inevitably the same thing is going to happen to Anthropic too.
Funny, new hires are similarly worried the Anthropic CEO only cares about money, so they have something in common!
Even the Philippines and Thailand are lower in per-capita usage compared to the US, most of the higher use are in Europe. Interestingly Australia & New Zealand are also pretty high, similar to Europe and far more than Asia & Africa in general, with the exception being Saudi Arabia (similar to US) and Israel (even higher than Australia). https://openai.com/signals/data
I had same experience with OpenAI. I have the $200/month plan and use 5.6 Sol all the time. What would normally use about 2% of my weekly allowance burned through $100 of credits in 40 minutes.
The frontier AI (OpenAI, Anthropic, Cursor, Mistral, xAI, Perplexity plus more) all run CI on Buildkite, without the suffering.
The frontier AI (OpenAI, Anthropic, Cursor, Mistral, xAI, Perplexity plus more) all run CI on Buildkite, without the suffering.
I think there's a coherent argument lurking in there, but the author hasn't refined it enough. Here's my attempt. The industrial revolution seemed like the end of the artisan as an important man in his community, the death of good taste, and an apocalypse for professions like furniture makers. And yet, do you remember the Aeron chair, darling of the dotcom era startup? The Eames chair, that wood veneer conversation piece which every real estate agent chooses when staging an apartment? In an era of mass production, taste moves up the market, but it never quite goes away. Where does that leave our taste, dear reader? I am not sure. What I do know is that, just as the Aeron chair could not exist in a world without mass production, so too will there be tasteful software which cannot exist in …
I bet they cache a lot more than OpenAI can though.
OpenAI can very plausibly target ads far better than Google can. Email is a good window but lots of people talk in more depth with a chat bot. Search is a good “purchase intent moment” but people are telling a chat bot exactly what they care about in a purchase, rather than making indirect search terms and reading review sites.
its just simple as someone think he knows better than the engineer, anthropic and open ai doesn't have those people currently as they are private.
No, that's backwards. OpenAI are the ones investing in Cerebras. Part of the deal is that they can't sell to Anthropic.
No, that's backwards. OpenAI are the ones investing in Cerebras. Part of the deal is that they can't sell to Anthropic.
I found this post a bit too verbose and incoherent. It does read like AI slop to me, but the bigger issue is that its core argument itself seems flawed. The author seems to be advocating for choosing to "carry the burden" of one's taste (or aesthetics, judgement, standards, etc) while bemoaning that the market may not sufficiently reward for doing so. IMHO, the core flaw is in mixing these two things 1) the market rewarding what it chooses to reward; and 2) individuals choosing to pursue some external/internal rewards. I broadly agree with the premise that Gen AI has lowered the cost of software development and, as a result, the quality of the idea and its execution have become more salient differentiators than just the ability to bring an idea to reality. I also agree that pursuing …
> For Plus and Pro users, we’re updating GPT‑5.6 Sol in Chat to be more reliable with facts and provide more focused answers. I was not impressed with 5.6 and this hits exactly why. Also, this instant, medium, and high slider situation we now have everywhere is batshit crazy. It’s a major step back in technology. I’ll put money on the table there will be a surprise in revenue because users have no clue what to choose, so they are constantly choosing high because they don’t want to risk getting inaccurate answers. If this was intentional by the dark patterns department, then brilliant. However, I’m guessing Anthropic and OpenAI are struggling to know how to deploy their models. Also, the models were already amazing. They need to slow down and do a model release once a year and only do e…
> For Plus and Pro users, we’re updating GPT‑5.6 Sol in Chat to be more reliable with facts and provide more focused answers. I was not impressed with 5.6 and this hits exactly why. Also, this instant, medium, and high slider situation we now have everywhere is batshit crazy. It’s a major step back in technology. I’ll put money on the table there will be a surprise in revenue because users have no clue what to choose, so they are constantly choosing high because they don’t want to risk getting inaccurate answers. If this was intentional by the dark patterns department, then brilliant. However, I’m guessing Anthropic and OpenAI are struggling to know how to deploy their models. Also, the models were already amazing. They need to slow down and do a model release once a year and only do e…
Maybe it’s just me but (and I ask this as something of an ML practitioner myself) can anyone at Anthropic or Open AI or any of the frontier labs work on summarizing content into a format where a human won’t immediately vomit? There’s this sort of local optima all these models pick which is instantly recognizable and hardly digestible for human consumption. Perhaps too much internal RL against benchmarks during chain of thought? The older non reasoning models had they’re own problems but at this point I can’t get an LLM to summarize data for humans, which is troubling. As much as I’d like to read this piece it follows suit and I don’t have the patience to try and extract anything valuable from it.
It doesn't fit their own definition of AGI, although it's inevitably vague [0]: >artificial general intelligence (AGI)—by which we mean highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work [0] https://openai.com/charter/
Location: Mumbai, India Remote: Yes Willing to relocate: Yes — Hyderabad or Bengaluru preferred Technologies: Node.js, TypeScript, JavaScript, Express, LoopBack, REST, microservices, PostgreSQL, Oracle, MySQL, Redis, Elasticsearch, Docker, Linux, Jenkins, AWS, Python, React, Next.js, React Native, LangChain, RAG, Qdrant, OpenAI, Gemini Résumé/CV: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1McNKRI8AjV41mFbi9iz2hMiKZec... Email: codeursahil2233@gmail.com Know more about me: https://www.sahilsdevlab.com/ Senior SDE at Valuefy, a wealth-management fintech — about three years in, promoted to Senior within a year of graduating. I own backend delivery across three HDFC Bank programs: a domestic portfolio reporting platform, an offshore product for high-AUM clien…
Methodology: HN Search returns recent public items matching a monitored company name. AIIStack stores a short normalized excerpt and the original link, deduplicates by company/provider/item ID, and creates an activity signal only after a threshold of newly observed records. Review the original discussion before making a decision.