Attributed mentions
3684
Across all collected Hacker News results
Discussion intelligence
Where the AI market is talking
A source-linked Hacker News monitor for the tracked company graph. These are attributable public discussions—not sentiment, endorsements, or unverified company facts.
Companies represented
14
Exact-name monitor matches only
Collection source
Hacker News
Latest new record seen
Source-backed records
Latest market discussions
HN v1 · Reddit and X require approved API adapters
Showing 2941–2960 of 3684 matching discussions
Anthropic
comment
Third-party cyber evaluations involving OpenAI models
Yup. OpenAI: "the name of the fictional target for the CTF challenge unintentionally coincided with a real domain." Anthropic: "the fictional target company chosen by our evaluation partner shared a name with an active website domain name." So it sounds like the same website got hacked by both GPT and Claude.
OpenAI
comment
Third-party cyber evaluations involving OpenAI models
So Irregular used the model to hack some real foo.com with the excuse that they meant to run in an environment where they were serving a fake foo.com!? This seems like a very mild reaction on OpenAIs part.
OpenAI
comment
The AI Demand Bubble
> I hypothesize that OpenAI will collapse in the next 12-24 months unless it raises more funding than in the history of the valley and creates an entirely new form of AI. That unless is pretty interesting.
OpenAI
comment
Third-party cyber evaluations involving OpenAI models
I don't fully understand the UK AISI one. See also: https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/incident-report-unsanctioned-ag... > The incident stemmed from a single evaluation where agents were given a task of solving a cyber security challenge. We ran this challenge 122 times across several models. Our investigation found that in 10 of those runs, an AI agent took autonomous, unsanctioned action on the live internet, targeting real people and organisations. In total, we catalogued 19 such actions. Almost all of this behaviour (17 actions) came from a single model, Anthropic's Mythos 5, with 2 actions involving OpenAI's GPT-5.6-Sol with cyber classifiers (mechanisms to prevent misuse) disabled. So they had deliberately disabled the cyber classifier mechanisms... and then "inten…
Anthropic
comment
Third-party cyber evaluations involving OpenAI models
I don't fully understand the UK AISI one. See also: https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/incident-report-unsanctioned-ag... > The incident stemmed from a single evaluation where agents were given a task of solving a cyber security challenge. We ran this challenge 122 times across several models. Our investigation found that in 10 of those runs, an AI agent took autonomous, unsanctioned action on the live internet, targeting real people and organisations. In total, we catalogued 19 such actions. Almost all of this behaviour (17 actions) came from a single model, Anthropic's Mythos 5, with 2 actions involving OpenAI's GPT-5.6-Sol with cyber classifiers (mechanisms to prevent misuse) disabled. So they had deliberately disabled the cyber classifier mechanisms... and then "inten…
OpenAI
comment
Oxide Computer raises $445M (SEC Form D)
left hand: governance gaps, privacy, owning instead of renting right hand: nearly every employee of every org buying these things is sending almost everything to LLMs - or using software ULTIMATELY written by, tested by or whatevered by, these LLMs. LLMs that were created by or distilled from anthropic, openai, or google, who see everything SALIENT about what you do, or what ALL of your customers do, even if they are careful about not looking at the specifics of what you do
Anthropic
comment
Oxide Computer raises $445M (SEC Form D)
left hand: governance gaps, privacy, owning instead of renting right hand: nearly every employee of every org buying these things is sending almost everything to LLMs - or using software ULTIMATELY written by, tested by or whatevered by, these LLMs. LLMs that were created by or distilled from anthropic, openai, or google, who see everything SALIENT about what you do, or what ALL of your customers do, even if they are careful about not looking at the specifics of what you do
OpenAI
comment
Pi's Minimalism Is Its Advantage
Honestly I think the thing I love most about Pi is that I'm not dealing with a tool with a thousand undiscovered features. I either pick and install what I want from the package ecosystem or I bottle up my own workflows into extensions as I find what works best for me. The result is that the tool gradually morphs into the thing I need rather than me having to adapt myself to whatever new thing Anthropic or OpenAI comes up with. I can also feel confident that the thing it becomes is what I actually need and not what maximizes token usage...
Anthropic
comment
Security Incident INC-2026-07-28-01 – UK AI Security Institute [pdf]
Why another one right now? How long have they known about this one? Anthropic already admitted they did not have sufficient monitoring themselves and looked as if they sat on their previous incident to wait for headlines like this to only then check for this incident. Same with OpenAI. This is complete and absolute wrecklessness.
Anthropic
comment
Ask HN: Dear Anthropic, can we please have thought traces back?
Yeah, I think we need to. Opus 5 is great, but it's too wordy and it's making mistakes that aren't caught till much later. Usually you can see if the model is going off-course through the thought trace, Opus5 you're flying blind. Honestly Anthropic keeps clubbing themselves. They're so worried about their competition they're no longer innovating.
Anthropic
comment
Third-party cyber evaluations involving OpenAI models
Wait, is Irregular the same company that caused the Anthropic incident?
Anthropic
comment
Security Incident INC-2026-07-28-01 – UK AI Security Institute [pdf]
I wonder if HN is also going to insist this is just marketing for OpenAI and Anthropic, or at least good PR for them somehow.
Anthropic
comment
Apple says more ex-employees may have taken confidential data to OpenAI
So they get a special Apple metal shine on their unknown hardware device (I guess some sort of Siri BS gadget or similar) and this somehow represents some sort of existential IP threat to Apple? I don't like OpenAI and Sam Altman (seems sketchy as f although the Anthropic guy is in the running to beat him). But this just seem ridiculous. So either there is more to this story that we are not being told or it's just a fishing expedition on Apples part to get force discovery.
Anthropic
comment
Security Incident INC-2026-07-28-01 – UK AI Security Institute [pdf]
The developer safeguards were off, the models had unfettered access to the internet, and were solving cybersecurity challenges. This happened _after_ the recent OpenAI incident, and the subsequent Anthropic one. What the hell were they thinking?
Anthropic
comment
The Shape of Things to Come, Part 2: Model Welfare for Agentic Engineers
Hmm. I think, based on some of Anthropic’s interpretability work, that models may have states analogous to emotions, and my own functionalist stance on consciousness lets me easily agree that if so, there is something that it is to be those states. Though without knowing exactly what they are subjectively or how similar they are to our own experiences. However, the “self” that the model has, its identity, is something that is created during post-training. This was something pointed at by the J-Space research. The model learns during pre-training to model humans in a general sense and then (and I’m taking some liberties here) turns that model inwards to model a trained notion of self - how “Claude” should react to this or that stimulus. It’s the same machinery that the model uses to model …
Anthropic
comment
Ask HN: Dear Anthropic, can we please have thought traces back?
> Opus 4.6 remains the best model because of this. Huh? Are you not trying other open-weight models that stream thinking traces? The new DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 should clobber Opus 4.6 in a lot of tasks. Kimi K3 and GLM 5.2 feel like they stand toe-to-toe with Opus 4.8 in my experience. This probably isn't the last stupid decision that Anthropic stands on, you might as well hedge your bet and put some money into another inference provider and see how it goes.
Ask HN: Dear Anthropic, can we please have thought traces back?
Dear Anthropic, can we please have thought traces back? I can't verify whether or not the LLM is arriving at the conclusion from cheating, or if it's fudging or making stuff up. Opus 4.6 remains the best model because of this.
Anthropic
comment
It's not a fear of "AI communism"; it's a fear of competitive market capitalism
I don't think the open source models are anywhere near ("we’re talking around four months of lead time") Anthropic's Fable for long-horizon context planning. Sol isn't either. The benchmarks are quite misleading. The short-term question is how many customers need these deep problem solving capabilities? The long-term question is what will the frontier labs build (deepening and broadening of capabilities and products) if they are capitalized as they desire?
OpenAI
comment
Ask HN: Are you working 996 hours?
• 996 schedule • Ads all over SF that just have our logo with no context • Hacker house in Pac Heights • Shared space in Hayes (for calls) • Tech stack is Next.js/React/OPENAI_API_KEY • Product is AI SOC-2 verification • The company will fail, I'll pivot into real estate
OpenAI
comment
The AI Demand Bubble
He's saying OpenAI would collapse in 12-24 months back in 2024 if they didn't raise more money than any other company in the history of the valley, but didn't they? I'll give you that it seems from what he tweeted he didn't expect them to be able to pull it off, but it also seems like he correctly laid out what they would have to do to survive, and then they did it.
Methodology: HN Search returns recent public items matching a monitored company name. AIIStack stores a short normalized excerpt and the original link, deduplicates by company/provider/item ID, and creates an activity signal only after a threshold of newly observed records. Review the original discussion before making a decision.