Hugging Face

Observed profile

Open-source AI platform for models, datasets, and developer tooling.

As of , AIIStack tracks Hugging Face's Popularity score at 95/100, up 0 points.

Headquarters
Not disclosed
Founded
Founded year not disclosed
Official website
huggingface.co
Claim or correct

Cohort-normalized indicators

Company scorecard

Popularity score
95/100
Change
0 pts
Interpretation
Current cohort score
Momentum score
66.43/100
Change
5.71 pts
Interpretation
Current cohort score
Innovation score
66.43/100
Change
5.71 pts
Interpretation
Current cohort score

Activity timeline

Material changes

Updated
Mention spike
Notable

25 new attributable Hacker News discussions were observed in the last seven days.

Mention spike
Notable

25 new attributable Hacker News discussions were observed in the last seven days.

Mention spike
Notable

25 new attributable Hacker News discussions were observed in the last seven days.

GitHub release
Notable

huggingface/transformers released Patch release: v5.15.1

Mention spike
Notable

25 new attributable Hacker News discussions were observed in the last seven days.

Mention spike
Notable

25 new attributable Hacker News discussions were observed in the last seven days.

Mention spike
Notable

25 new attributable Hacker News discussions were observed in the last seven days.

Discussion intelligence

Recent Hacker News mentions

All market discussions
comment

On the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem

this is really funny. "the same strict safeguards" and "isolation". ok, Hugging Face and DseWiki would like to have a word

Inspect discussion
comment

Ask HN: Who wants to be hired? (September 2026)

Location: Mangalore, India (Open to all time zones) Remote: Yes (Worldwide / US, EU & APAC overlap) Willing to relocate: Yes (Bengaluru, Pune, Hyderabad, or international) Technologies: TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Node.js, Express, React, Next.js, React Native, Expo, SQL (PostgreSQL, MySQL), MongoDB, REST APIs, Git, Docker, PyTorch, Hugging Face (Transformers), LLM/Agent Orchestration Résumé/CV: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1n91ZrcZhMwNqENfiqBj1Z1Le-9g... Portfolio: https://akash-portfolio-psi-five.vercel.app/ GitHub: https://github.com/BlxrryFxce17 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/akashv10 Email: akashvmsn@gmail.com Full-stack and applied AI engineer (recent MCA graduate) focused on buil…

Inspect discussion
comment

There Gonna Be a Shortage of Everything

> The AIs that took part in the Hugging Face hack were not simply finding a shortcut to cheat on the evaluations IIRC, they were given an impossible task and told to solve it, and they took action to resolve that internal conflict. This is a famously human problem too - see Kobayashi Maru [1] and others [2][3][4]. In hindsight it's obvious that instructions to AI (A. Intelligence ) need to be guarded against this class of errors, just like laws, rules, guidelines etc. in human societies. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kobayashi_Maru [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch-22_(logic) [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordian_Knot [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_standoff

Inspect discussion
comment

An Alien Mind

>For example, in the OpenAI-Hugging Face incident, the agents preserved a boundary of not social engineering humans. Or, to be precise - it preserved a goal of not contacting any human while participating in a misaligned operation. The agent that thought about "not social-engineering humans" used this phrase to gaslight itself out of notifying a human that the incident was happening. szymonie, na prawde jestem wkurwiony na to jak nieodpowiedzialnie postepujecie. budujecie bombe atomowa a bawicie sie tym jak dzieci

Inspect discussion
comment

An Alien Mind

> "For example, in the OpenAI-Hugging Face incident, the agents preserved a boundary of not social engineering humans." Actually, in the Wiki incident OpenAI tried to cover up, the agents tried to socially-engineer the humans of that forum by impersonating their forum's mod. (From collusion.wiki: "They use some tricks (for unknown reasons) to pretend to be the admin – for example, they make an account that appears to be the same as the administrator’s username, except it uses a nearly identical Cyrillic е character in the admin’s username instead of the Latin one." )

Inspect discussion

Public discussion records are evidence of conversation, not a sentiment or product-quality verdict.