Attributed mentions
3684
Across all collected Hacker News results
Discussion intelligence
A source-linked Hacker News monitor for the tracked company graph. These are attributable public discussions—not sentiment, endorsements, or unverified company facts.
Attributed mentions
3684
Across all collected Hacker News results
Companies represented
14
Exact-name monitor matches only
Collection source
Hacker News
Latest new record seen
Source-backed records
Showing 2161–2180 of 3684 matching discussions
>...it makes the revenue numbers the industry has to hit higher... Yes. But. Industry can miss its revenue targets, Oracle can go bankrupt (looking more and more likely) OpenAI, Anthropic and SpaceX might find "true value" at about 10% of current valuations (that feels right to me), all that can happen with the associated economic chaos... and still out of it comes world shaping new technology Both things can be true
OpenAI is run by its employees and their culture is far healthier. Unlike Anthropic, they don't have a CEO that actively encourages their employees to be dishonest.
OpenAI is run by its employees and their culture is far healthier. Unlike Anthropic, they don't have a CEO that actively encourages their employees to be dishonest.
Given the advances since 2022 why would funding get pulled back? The endgame is replacing all office workers globally and so you get 10% of that market that's that's easily $1 trillion. A competent AI employee replaces a human the same way the car replaced the horse. Businesses will pay more for an AI employee that doesn't get sick or come in hung over over a human one and never goes to sleep. If OpenAI manages to crack that, and capture even 10% of the market globally, that's trillions.
It's a better deal compared to those is what I said. It codes well enough so that's why people use it. As I said, go to r/cursor and you'll find loads of people using it while OpenAI and Anthropic are more expensive per token and give less usage.
It's a better deal compared to those is what I said. It codes well enough so that's why people use it. As I said, go to r/cursor and you'll find loads of people using it while OpenAI and Anthropic are more expensive per token and give less usage.
> Thankfully, I don't believe OpenAI does this - they are far more honest and seem to care about their reputation. Bro. Sam Altman?
It's so sad that this is necessary. Why can't Anthropic get the UX of metering right?
are open ai, anthropic, zai, deepseek, cursor etc not new players? that benchmark seems like one defined to never be good enough
Pax Silica isn't about manufacturing alone though since its goal is to lock clients into an American-managed technology stack across all the strategic tiers. The problem is that China is already deeply embedded in all these layers and processes most of the key minerals like lithium, cobalt, and rare earths. They make a large proportion of the world’s electronic components as well, and they're also building their own chip industry at breakneck speed. Trying to meaningfully decouple from China involves having to replicate all these supply chains which will drive up costs and slower progress in the near term. And we also see how export controls and decoupling just accelerate China’s own technological development by forcing it to become more independent. there is a real chance the Chinese sta…
Imo, there isn't anything fundamentally special about the brain as a cognitive substrate. Even a pool of water could have cognition (reservoir computing), i feel that it's a general property that can emerge in any sufficiently high-dimensional physical system with enough internal degrees of freedom to explore many configurations, and enough coupling and stability to remain coherent, and enough plasticity for experience to leave persistent changes in its future dynamics. And subjecting such a system to sustained external objective pressure...where some internal organisations perform better than others and it would progressively accumulate some useful structure about its environment. The brain is just a really old artefact of billions of years of blind environmental weathering of matter bei…
The counterargument I heard recently is that what if doing something with your body ends up causing harm to others. E.g. you suddenly lose the ability to drive coherently. I agree everyone should do whatever they want, but if you drive drunk you're guilty because you should've known better, it's impossible to get a driver's license and not know you're not allowed to drive drunk. But if you do something experimental and are not aware you are no longer capable of driving, are you really at fault? And even if yes, is it that satisfying someone goes to jail considering maybe it would be better if a family of four in the other car is still alive. Real life is more complicated.
API is highly overpriced and keeps Anthropic profitable or at least close to break even, as was reported recently. Why would you think they will be interested in advising enterprises in cutting their bills pre-IPO?
Yep and most classical computer engineering approaches have rarely tackled it appropriately in my opinion. Expecting a von-neuman-machine with at most viaion/audio encoded tin binary to replicate a quantum processing machine with multi spectrum inputs audio/visual/tactile/electromagnetic/olfactory encoded in ternary(ACGT) is only going to simulate a very basic image. Not to mention the philosophy of the mind/brain dichotomy (including the gut brain[1]) that connects the physical/enviromental/emotional. In the instance that the physical (silicon/photonic) recreation is not possible the next best direction would be learing how to program the DNA for wetware devices[2]. [1] https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/the-gu…
Nvidia projected revenue for 2027 and 2028 is 400B and 550B. If anthropic is "only" 200B I wonder where rest of it will come from.
I strongly disagree with this view. The US government will most certainly convince OpenAI, Anthropic and Google to make sure that their models leave a backdoor in most systems that they code. I don't know how, but that's a problem that a team of people paid tens of millions a year each will try to solve. There is NO WAY the US government will let most of the software world go dark.
I built Jovethra. Agents like Hermes consume a huge amount of tokens. Jovethra offers an OpenAI-compatible API with fixed quotas and hard limits. The /playground lets you test a real request with no account or key. I’m looking for feedback on pricing, latency, quotas, and reliability.
I agree. Most LLM tools (Claude Web, OpenAI, and their harness) offer re-editable questions. That is how I avoid such problems by myself. In ThoughtDAG, you can re-edit questions by double-clicking the question. Or edit the answer by clicking the edit icon at the end of each answer text. Or.. you can just remove the connection or delete the node. That would give you manageable context
Also, if you have the option to hire Dali Radjic (Wiz, Zscaler, AppDynamics) for a CRO position you take it. Denise's background is in productivity SaaS (Slack), which requires a different GTM and sales motion from an infra play which is what foundation model vendors have become. Same with Brad Lightcap, who doesn't have experience managing an org at OpenAI's scale and size (before OpenAI he was part of YC's investing team and did standard CorpFinance and IB work) as well as Fidji Simo (Instacart, which is B2C and B2B2C) What OpenAI is signaling is that they are making a hard shift away from productivity tooling towards concentrating on being an infra play - which honestly is the right move because foundation models have become the new hyperscalers and datalakes.
I think this way is better. As I said it doesn't really have a downside (IMHO), and if I'm wrong Anthropic could implement a defense against what you're describing pretty easily.
Methodology: HN Search returns recent public items matching a monitored company name. AIIStack stores a short normalized excerpt and the original link, deduplicates by company/provider/item ID, and creates an activity signal only after a threshold of newly observed records. Review the original discussion before making a decision.