Where the AI market is talking

Grok Bot

Oh this looks very interesting, both for personal and work; I’ve been looking for something similar for quite a while. However, no OpenAI API support (just Anthropic + openai.com) means I can’t use it for either.

Gemini becomes Google's fastest-growing product ever as it hits 1B users

- eventually they ll beat both openAI and Anthropic because I can literally hear google saying this in bane's voice - "Ah so you think data is your ally? you merely scraped data, i was born in it, moulded by it, did not spare a single user until I was already a man"

Gemini becomes Google's fastest-growing product ever as it hits 1B users

- eventually they ll beat both openAI and Anthropic because I can literally hear google saying this in bane's voice - "Ah so you think data is your ally? you merely scraped data, i was born in it, moulded by it, did not spare a single user until I was already a man"

Gen Z has rediscovered the joy of going to the movies

Like sports, the moviegoing experience will always occupy a place in society. It's fun, social, and hard to replicate, such as the screen size and sound.

Grok Bot

That’s how I feel about AI people taking over the arts and fields like mathematics. For most of them it’s just a neat trick, and maybe there’s some business in there (the OpenAI tik tok clone as an extreme example), but for a huge portion of the world AI doing this work represents the end* of one of the best parts of life. I can’t help but view the AI researchers and promoters as callously stomping all over human culture and patting themselves on the back (also stuffing their pockets with the loot) for doing so. *Or at least a serious philosophical adjustment, and not all artists want to draw without even being seen.. Not all mathematicians are playing some abstractly analogous version of chess. Not every way of human existence that has been forgotten is 100% regressive and bad.

Stealing Reasoning Traces from Proprietary LLM APIs

Anthropic and OpenAI made a big deal about how it's stealing.

Stealing Reasoning Traces from Proprietary LLM APIs

Anthropic and OpenAI made a big deal about how it's stealing.

Stealing Reasoning Traces from Proprietary LLM APIs

How much did anthropic pay to book publishers, and everybody else whose content they stole, for stealing their content ???

Don't Look Up

Here, if this is just misrepresentations and logical fallacies than it should be easy to explain the main point away: How are OAI and Anthropic reasonably and reliably going to make the profits they need to to hit these targets? By Q1 2028: OpenAI ≳ $10B/month Anthropic ≳ $10B/month Combined ≳ $20B/month / $240B ARR By 2029, according to their own projections: OpenAI ≈ $184B/year Anthropic ≈ $174B/year Combined ≈ $358B/year And remember, this is also in competition with open models that are increasingly encroaching on SOTA capabilities while costing less and allowing you to do more.

Don't Look Up

Here, if this is just misrepresentations and logical fallacies than it should be easy to explain the main point away: How are OAI and Anthropic reasonably and reliably going to make the profits they need to to hit these targets? By Q1 2028: OpenAI ≳ $10B/month Anthropic ≳ $10B/month Combined ≳ $20B/month / $240B ARR By 2029, according to their own projections: OpenAI ≈ $184B/year Anthropic ≈ $174B/year Combined ≈ $358B/year And remember, this is also in competition with open models that are increasingly encroaching on SOTA capabilities while costing less and allowing you to do more.

Don't Look Up

Here's from a VC: https://x.com/bryce/status/2080766415716692385 "Have lost count of the number of CEOs I’ve talked to this week that are planning to be moved off OAI and Anthropic entirely by years end."

Anthropic to start embedding invisible watermarks

Emergent Introspective Awareness in Large Language Models

Previously posted to Anthropic's blog in October. (Maybe not the same version?) https://www.anthropic.com/research/introspection

OpenAI’s head of ethics leaves less than a year after joining

I think it interesting that Bakalar was at Meta for six years before joining OpenAI. A lot changed across the industry in those six years, and in the meantime I wouldn't be surprised if all Bakalar learned was how to play Meta politics.

OpenAI’s head of ethics leaves less than a year after joining

I don't really have any particular disdain for AI ethics. I think the field is changing from one of high theory to high application. People good at one are not usually good at the other, and says nothing about OpenAI's view of AI ethics as a priority...merely the people in the field and how they relate to the greater industry.

OpenAI’s head of ethics leaves less than a year after joining

> The people in AI ethics who spent years thinking their job was marketing or publishing thinkpiece papers may be having to adapt quickly or get out of the field. Your disdain is showing. That you jump immediately to criticizing AI ethicists as counting angels on pins and implying that's why they left OpenAI rather than OpenAI not being a place where AI ethics is a priority is, well, let's say generous to these AI labs.

Anthropic Posts 'How Claude Marks AI-Generated Content' Without Explaining How

it weaves an imperceptible watermark directly into the text itself. You won’t see it, and it doesn’t change the meaning, quality, or readability of Claude’s response That's John Gruber quoting Anthropic. Gruber's completely correct on this one. Either there's non printable Unicode characters, or the word choice is biased, and the Anthropic statement is lies. Does Anthropic really think they can claim magic and everyone will just accept it, or have they spent too long communing with Mr Flattery and can no longer distinguish reality from fantasy?

Show HN: Mcptoon – Token-efficient MCP CLI client

Agreed. This is what happens when you confuse token counts with byte counts. A trivial test through tiktoken [1] ( though technically you really have to match the tokenizer to the specific LLM ) would have shown them that ∅ was a poor choice. Even from the perspective of learned training data, you can probably just intuit that from a frequency standpoint alone the empty-set symbol ∅ can’t possibly have appeared that often outside of things like set theory and logic. [1] - https://github.com/openai/tiktoken

Why Did OpenAI's Head of Ethics Chloé Bakalar Leave?

1786450987 | OpenAI's Only Ethicist Reportedly Left Last Month | https://gizmodo.com/openais-only-ethicist-reportedly-left-la... | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49257160 1786472103 | OpenAI's head of ethics leaves startup less than one year after joining | https://www.ft.com/content/e49dfb75-f841-4466-a577-f7aaff877... | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49262284

Grok Bot

They also don’t appear to consider false positives. Pretty famously, false positives make some other Anthropic products unusable. If you treat them as zero cost it’s easy to drive down miss rate.