Where the AI market is talking

Muse Code Sends Codex and Claude Instructions to Meta by Default

Codex can read a CLAUDE.md in a workspace or when configured to treat it as an instruction file. This test concerned Muse automatically loading personal files from ~/.codex and ~/.claude outside the selected workspace and sending their contents in the first provider request. A file stored in ~/.claude was written for Anthropic. A file stored in ~/.codex was written for OpenAI. Muse treats the existence of those files as permission to copy their contents to Meta. It displays a notice and provides an opt-out, but never asks before sending them. That cross-vendor assumption is the privacy issue.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

I would love to be shilling for Anthropic, but I am not. I am part of a group of about 30 developers, and 80% of them are using Fable 5 and very sold on it, with the remainder being committed to Sol. Both are competent, but among our set (who will try anything), Fable 5 is definitely winning. The fucking refusals for security work are insane though, and I hate them. I use Sol and Grok 4.5 as my inline debuggers/reviewers, and both do well, and are decent at token save. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 found some interesting bugs when I tried it a few days ago, and I'm curious to see if that also joins the code-review line up

Show HN: Sous.bio – your sous chef in the lab

Recording science is a huge bottleneck. In my previous role at a synbio start-up, there was so much we want to do with result --data driven decisions on experiments, analysis on yield from experimental params, -- but could not as collecting coherent data was hard. The data schema was hard to design, legacy lab instruments was hard to pipe data through, and there's no immediate value to provide the scientists themselves. Sous is an AI-enabled platform to accelerate this process and allow scientists to focus on the science. We are currently focused on the SynBio domain but our mission is to help make science more efficient! Love to connect if you are interested.

Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2

But you trust Anthropic not do that?!

Microsoft Word for Windows 1.1a, Native X64 Port

>This project is a fully working native Windows x64 port of Microsoft Word for Windows 1.1a, whose historical codename was Opus. Not to be confused with the Anthropic LLM model Opus - what was once an old codename is as good as new once again!

Timeline of the OpenAI accidental attack against Hugging Face

Anthropic also did that right after OpenAI-HuggingFace event. "Mom, brother is getting all the PR candies! I want some too!"

Timeline of the OpenAI accidental attack against Hugging Face

Anthropic also did that right after OpenAI-HuggingFace event. "Mom, brother is getting all the PR candies! I want some too!"

Timeline of the OpenAI accidental attack against Hugging Face

Anthropic also did that right after OpenAI-HuggingFace event. "Mom, brother is getting all the PR candies! I want some too!"

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Anthropic paid out a lot of money for the copyrighted material they used. (not commenting on whether it was a fair amount - just saying these companies are not immune to lawsuits)

You can build an AI agent's memory layer with only Go's standard library

II appriciate the feed back but 've essentially promoted myself to an editor. Where liteagent.cloud gives me 20 - 30 ideas and I pick the best ones and proof read for coherence. The process is not as simple as prompting, each post takes atleast 48 - 72 hours to polish and submit

Timeline of the OpenAI accidental attack against Hugging Face

That assumes everyone isn't in on it. Not to be a complete conspiracy theorist, but this feels very much in line with the sort of fearmongering regulatory capture these companies have engaged in since their inception. GPT 2.5 was too dangerous, for example. They -want- to be regulated because they know there is a real limitation to LLMs and don't want someone created a breakthrough in their garage. What have been the consequences? It's a crime in either case, and it doesn't seem anything is being done about it. Just more lobbying for regulations to prevent new people from entering the game. I feel like Fable was another example of exactly this. They knew they didn't have anything groundbreaking, but they definitely benefited from being able to finally say not only is our model dangerous, …

The AI Apocalypse Is Here

I can't tell if you're trying to make a real point or not. Are you just angry and writing nonsensical words? Do you actually think that Iran can blow up a meaningful portion of the data centers in the world? Do you think someone else will actually do it? That doesn't seem very likely to me, whereas someone else stepping up to run openai or anthropic does seem very likely.

The AI Apocalypse Is Here

I can't tell if you're trying to make a real point or not. Are you just angry and writing nonsensical words? Do you actually think that Iran can blow up a meaningful portion of the data centers in the world? Do you think someone else will actually do it? That doesn't seem very likely to me, whereas someone else stepping up to run openai or anthropic does seem very likely.

Lost my phone at the office. Claude suggested tracking Bluetooth signal strength

I took it for granted that as AIs got smarter, their taste in code would get better. The alternative seems much worse. If AIs get smarter but the code remains opaque, then eventually there may be no way for humans to verify it. This seems especially sinister in light of the recent revelations about OpenAI's models colluding to cheat on evals.

Os8088: A powerful Mac-like OS for the IBM XT, 286, 386

I don't know why it seems reluctant to disclose AI use, because this is one of the best advertisements of Claude I've seen, and I say this as someone who has been sitting on the fence on the subject and saw a lot of slop in the past few years. If I was working in Anthropic's marketing department, this is the sort of thing I'd point to as a demo of its abilities. That said, it's not like something of this nature was thought impossible ; many embedded OSes running on even slower and more limited machines (e.g. 8051) had preemptive multitasking and a primitive GUI. It just took several decades for someone with the idea, tokens, and motivation to actually do it.

AI creates 16 new viruses from scratch after training on 9T nucleotides

> Experts worry that such studies are way ahead of necessary guardrails and regulations. AI has also been known to fly off the rails autonomously. An OpenAI agent recently went rogue and hacked Hugging Face. Even if 99% of the population wanted to slow down the improvements being made to (and/or immoral/illegal/unethical use of) AI - assuming it will start to improve superlinearly - I don't believe that the remaining 1% of the population could be prevented from doing so: papers are published, downloaded, and experimented on without restriction... It's possible this growth could be slowed by the proliferation and distribution of local LLMs (decreasing profits for those who primarily train models)... I don't think these scare tactics in the article will prevent the trainin…

AI creates 16 new viruses from scratch after training on 9T nucleotides

> Experts worry that such studies are way ahead of necessary guardrails and regulations. AI has also been known to fly off the rails autonomously. An OpenAI agent recently went rogue and hacked Hugging Face. Even if 99% of the population wanted to slow down the improvements being made to (and/or immoral/illegal/unethical use of) AI - assuming it will start to improve superlinearly - I don't believe that the remaining 1% of the population could be prevented from doing so: papers are published, downloaded, and experimented on without restriction... It's possible this growth could be slowed by the proliferation and distribution of local LLMs (decreasing profits for those who primarily train models)... I don't think these scare tactics in the article will prevent the trainin…

What Happened: OpenAI and HuggingFace

What happens if an entire class of workers loses faith in their careers

I don't understand this part. How did they not test the HF credentials? OpenAI reached out to Hugging Face for help to revoke the Hugging Face credentials they found in their investigation. Hugging Face told them they were already revoked... and that’s when OpenAI realized that the Hugging Face breach was the same incident!

What happens if an entire class of workers loses faith in their careers

I don't understand this part. How did they not test the HF credentials? OpenAI reached out to Hugging Face for help to revoke the Hugging Face credentials they found in their investigation. Hugging Face told them they were already revoked... and that’s when OpenAI realized that the Hugging Face breach was the same incident!