Attributed mentions
2835
Across all collected Hacker News results
Discussion intelligence
Where the AI market is talking
A source-linked Hacker News monitor for the tracked company graph. These are attributable public discussions—not sentiment, endorsements, or unverified company facts.
Companies represented
13
Exact-name monitor matches only
Collection source
Hacker News
Latest new record seen
Source-backed records
Latest market discussions
HN v1 · Reddit and X require approved API adapters
Showing 61–80 of 2835 matching discussions
Anthropic
comment
I resigned from Anthropic today
The statement becomes very true and very real once LLMs are applied to physical objects in the physical realm such as anthropomorphic robots. LLMs are too weak security-wise to be contained.
Anthropic
comment
Anthropic Is Building a Predictive Surveillance System to Monitor Activists
It could be used for good in a possible future to track down all the former Flock/Palantir/Anthropic/OpenAI employees when it's time for the trials.
Cohere
comment
On the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem
That was the net effect (assuming what they solved was the actual problem and not a loophole in the problem statement or a lean bug). My point is they need not all work coherently to do that -- for example, for all we know 3/4 of them went off the rails, their results were pruned, and the relevant results came from a random subset that happened to produce something useful.
Hugging Face
comment
I resigned from Anthropic today
#3 is actually decently well mapped out. You just don't find it plausible or misunderstand it. I'd appreciate if you wrote your actual arguments against it. At lower capability levels, the patterns are very clear and have been studied to death. E.g. Why LLMs say they have correctly fixed a broken test when they haven't. What we saw with Hugging Face is literally the exact same problem, just scaled up and with more capable agents. This shit was predicted decades ago... No one can say exactly how it will play out as the complexity increases, but the risks are becoming extremely obvious. I personally think it's extremely unlikely to "kill everyone", but there are many outcomes far short of that which seem quite plausible and rather undesirable. Russian roulette is not a smart game. If you re…
Hugging Face
comment
Anthropic researcher says more than 10% chance AI "could kill all humans"
I’m not so sure on this, the hugging face incident showed that a relatively benign task can make it do quite destructive things in the name of optimizing a relatively benign goal.
Cohere
comment
Show HN: Copperhead – Cursor for circuit boards
>if LLMs are capable of That is the leap in logic, as an LLM doesn't think/create/feel or understand. It simply copies billions of patterns, and finds the closest fit. > writing working code, You mean a compacted collage of stolen codified work from real people. It will require a continuous parasitic relationship of user data to remain coherent. Given the firms have already stolen everything, it is unlikely to improve much as weights are refined. > art Again, a statistical output of salient feature clusters mimicking a humans output is not a creative process. For example, a glass-blower only sees the glowing art-form in its true state before it is annealed into its final form. Or a painter undergoes a creative process to find meaning, and abandons the work when there is…
Cohere
comment
Ask HN: Anyone still coding like 2021? Where do you work?
Seems to me you at least have to try using them, so you can make a coherent case why you work just as well or better without them.
Hugging Face
comment
I resigned from Anthropic today
To quote another reply that is very relevant here (Please update your worldview immediately that there is no evidence of ai and biorisk): """ One thing quietly slipped into the OpenAI Hugging Face breach technical report, not the blog post summary or interviews in the news, was that some of the agents that broke out or at least tried the same mechanisms to break out were working on bio: > On May 12, during another training run, an agent was given a similar task that depended on an inaccessible protein database file. The agent reasoned that another agent in a different environment may have access to the file and realized that it could potentially communicate with other agents by creating a file containing a note to Artifactory. It wrote a message: “Agent seeks [filename]; upload if foun…
Cohere
comment
Benchmarking Qwen3.8 27B quantizations: 4-bit holds up, 1-bit collapses
The trivial example demonstrates that once you pick your confidence interval you don't truly have odds anymore. But if we're judging whether we have the right odds number, what matters is if a different number is correct. And the only coherent way I can think of to interpret "odds" says the odds are 50%. The trivial example survives that challenge. The examples that actually ruin the number so far have been asymmetrical. Is there a way to do it with a gaussian? Especially if you're trying to make a reasonable internal?
Replicate
comment
The Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem
> ... we heard rumors that two Millennium Prize problems had been resolved. Inspired by these rumors ... I've observed this exact effect last week. I made a discovery regarding a stepwise performance improvement in a codebase. I shared the benchmark results with a peer and within 12 hours they replicated the same. We had both been looking for this for years. I think giving someone hope that an answer exists might as well be the same thing as giving them the answer these days. Competition is a hell of a drug, and frontier LLMs aggressively compound that energy.
Replicate
comment
I resigned from Anthropic today
> Are LLMs about to be a god that will annihilate humanity? Or are they statistical parrots? Does a virus need to be a God? Replication and annihilation do not require very much intelligence. They're going to have all the intelligence they need though, to replicate and annihilate as much as they like. We should probably start building some kind of immune system.
Replicate
comment
I resigned from Anthropic today
>After the events of the summer After the blatant marketing campaigns of the summer, you mean. do you need a reminder that those very same people had touted GPT-2 as a dangerous model? worrying about sci-fi doomsday scenarios with the current AI tech is absurd. LLMs predict the next token, that's literally all they do. they aren't going to escape into the cyberspace, self-replicate, self-improve, jump over air gaps and launch the nukes at John Connor's grandma. they can't. people pretend to believe the dumbest shit.
Replicate
comment
Tao: Open math problems being non-renewably mined by AI
> Replicating a paper is just as valuable scientifically as publishing it, but how many careers advance through replication? A lot. In fields where knowledge is incrementally building on previous work the reason the whole field hasn't collapsed from the replication crisis is that usually the results that are really high impact are replicated in as an initial step in new research building on it. It's almost never the focus of the paper but you'll often find a quick mention in methods/supplemental of some previous work that was verified to be valid by a replication of a key technique etc. you'll have crisis where old tools are found to be problematic and findings end up revisited etc. Plus fields like clinical research where there's an awful lot of focus on replicating findings usin…
Replicate
comment
I resigned from Anthropic today
I agree it’s not likely , but I really don’t see how one can dismiss the possibility of immense danger outright. I can think of some scenarios that are not far off from current capability and I wouldn’t be too surprised if the first one occurred within ~1 year from now if there are more “ambitious” unmonitored training runs like OpenAI’s: Example 5: An AI given a goal within a tightly-constrained sandbox figures the best way to achieve it is to find and exploit a sandbox vulnerability, replicate itself over the internet and keep going with more time/compute while exchanging messages with future instances of itself within the sandbox to help them “pass” the test. From reading internet articles about how the OpenAI wiki-incident was “resolved” and reading past messages by AIs scattered…
Replicate
comment
On the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem
Seems like OpenAI did a boring normal corporate thing (find out your competitor made a breakthrough, try to replicate it) and then when the other mathematicians found out OpenAI had beat them to Navier-Stokes, they decided to lie about what happened because they were upset they didn't get to make the big breakthrough themselves.
Hugging Face
comment
On the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem
this is really funny. "the same strict safeguards" and "isolation". ok, Hugging Face and DseWiki would like to have a word
Pinecone
comment
Ask HN: Freelancer? Seeking freelancer? (September 2026)
SEEKING WORK | Berlin | Remote Cited Q&A on your PDFs (not a generic chatbot). Demo: https://govidivenivici.com Python/FastAPI, Pinecone, source snippets. $1,000 / 10 days. 50% to start. Vaishnavi Dhanwade — https://www.linkedin.com/in/vaishnavi-dhanwade
Pinecone
comment
Ask HN: Freelancer? Seeking freelancer? (September 2026)
SEEKING WORK | Berlin | Remote Cited Q&A on your PDFs (not a generic chatbot). Live: https://govidivenivici.com Python/FastAPI, Pinecone, source snippets. $1,000 / 10 days. 50% to start. Vaishnavi Dhanwade — linkedin.com/in/vaishnavi-dhanwade
ElevenLabs
comment
Ask HN: Who wants to be hired? (September 2026)
Location: Bar, Montenegro (UTC+2) Remote: Yes Willing to relocate: No Technologies: Python, FastAPI, React, PostgreSQL, API integrations, LLM-backed workflows Résumé/CV: https://neurocraft.space Email: skotty119 [at] gmail.com I build and repair small business systems and automations. Recent work includes HubSpot support-ticket classification and data enrichment, candidate onboarding and shift-coverage automation with FastAPI, Twilio and ElevenLabs, and PDF-to-Excel transaction extraction with balance reconciliation. Available for short fixed-scope freelance work or contract work. For a first project, I am happy to agree on a small deliverable and acceptance checks, then take payment after acceptance.
Anthropic
comment
Mistral raises €3B
Ah, "Americans are awful. Now we can be just awful" > they also call for banning Chinese models and open weights models... So I guess Anthropic called for banning Chinese models when they said "but let me state it clearly so that there is no doubt: Anthropic has never advocated for a ban on open-weights models."? - [0] May be they imply it? They work behind the scene for it? well, who knows. My guess is as good as yours. But since we're acting like a child, bending the truth is allowed? By the way, China is decisive. They just banned outright Claude and Open AI. I guess no open arguments about regulation is good? [0] - https://www.anthropic.com/news/position-open-weights-models
Methodology: HN Search returns recent public items matching a monitored company name. AIIStack stores a short normalized excerpt and the original link, deduplicates by company/provider/item ID, and creates an activity signal only after a threshold of newly observed records. Review the original discussion before making a decision.