Where the AI market is talking

Tencent Releases and Open-Sources Tencent Hy4 Preview

My experience is that even Opus 5 still tends to write buggy or low-quality code and makes serious mistakes when analyzing code. It's a lot better than before but still not something I trust. I've had less experience with Fable since I can't use it at work; I hear it's a step up but still has its limits. For large tasks like a web browser or a compiler, even expensive swarms of frontier LLMs have not been shown capable of producing codebases that actually work. (Anthropic built a C compiler with Opus 4.6 but it lacked optimizations and apparently hit a complexity wall.) I also want to use LLMs for reverse engineering, but apparently it's pretty hit-or-miss, especially if you're forced to use open-source models to avoid restrictions.

Warp builds self-improving agents on Claude

It's interesting because Anthropic chose to put it on their Claude blog.

Will it be Anthropic or X AI after Cursor getting no access to OpenAI?

Ask HN: How to Vibe Design as Engineer?

I have discovered few skills, but haven't used them yet: npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/skills --skill canvas-design npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/skills --skill frontend-design

Warp builds self-improving agents on Claude

Or maybe Anthropic needs more companies like Warp to run Claude in thousands of loops to donate billions to their income statement. The I in AGI stands for "IPO".

Warp builds self-improving agents on Claude

This is just shilling for the Warp terminal, and this approach could have been a tweet, but okay, Anthropic, whatever helps increase your valuation.

GLM-5.3 is now open-weight

Looks like you've geniunely forgotten then: https://www.anthropic.com/news/fable-mythos-access

The growing divide between AI hype and software engineering reality

It hasn’t climbed the complexity bar for hard software engineering yet, fable still can’t build a fully functioning C Compiler, I think in the long horizon eval it can sometimes build a C pre-processor (not deterministic) given all the tests and a spec. And given the tests is a big deal, humans actually write the tests on their own while developing btw. Anthropics marketing stunt C compiler doesn’t count (that one didn’t even type check). Now the thing to claim “a better coder than humans”, is you can’t just stop at making a production grade C Compiler, you then also need to make the leap to make something new that is a definite improvement over everything that existed before it. This is an also a question of taste not just implementation chops. Think Zigs cross platform C Compiler, Rusts…

Warp builds self-improving agents on Claude

I was bit confused in the beginning thinking its some product from Anthropic, looks like Warp is the startup, most likely getting rebate on using Claude and providing functionality to users, trying to get them addicted to the feature. And Anthropic is the one thats doing marketing for them cause eventually its their LLM which is being used. Not sure about the agents but this arrangement is definitely increasing the value of both companies in circular fashion.

Eight Things to Know about Large Language Models(2023)

A post from Sam Bowman(Anthropic&NYU). Any update in 2026?

Sony Music and Warner Chappell Are Suing Anthropic

It is confusing that music companies are suing Anthropic, the one company that does not have any programmatic AI audio input or output through their models.

A Great Rebalancing Is Coming

I agree with the over simplified calculation. People have been going on about Germany and China having a surplus and the US a deficit for dunno 40 years saying it can't work but why not? If someone in the US wants a Merc and the Germans take Anthropic shares in exchange who cares?

OpenAI and Anthropic are ruining San Francisco

The regulatory environment for housing construction has changed a lot in the past 5 years, and in SF in particular the new "Family Zoning Plan" is a big deal. If OpenAI has been attempting to build housing in SF and got shot down by NIMBYs and regulations, I would agree that discharges their responsibility, but as far as I know they have not done this.

Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX

Musk was forced to admit under oath during his OpenAI lawsuit that xAI distilled GPT models to train Grok. No reason to believe he won't use Cursor data for the same thing, if it isn't happening already.

OpenAI and Anthropic are ruining San Francisco

Again, what you're saying is not what the social compact has historically been. Most companies, both inside and outside of Silicon Valley, happily recognize their informal responsibilities to the communities where they're located. Our AI overlords certainly have a legal right to skimp on social responsibility, but then they may not like the taxes that we have to enact on them in response. > Even I can see why this game is unwinnable. The point is that this is not supposed to be a "game" to win or lose. As a San Francisco business, OpenAI is supposed to care about the health of San Francisco in and of itself, not just doing the minimum to discharge some abstract duty. If San Francisco residents are going around saying "I'm unhappy about OpenAI, they're making my housing cost way too muc…

Sony Music and Warner Chappell Are Suing Anthropic

Fewer Americans Pay to Use LLMs Than Still Pay to Play World of Warcraft

Sure but why would you miss this part from the same leak? > OpenAI at the start of this year forecast that consumer subscribers to ChatGPT Go … would surge about 36 times to 112 million this year

The turbulent AI era is here

I am fine with socialists who actually try to provide clear arguments and proposals. That's why I'm a big fan of Cassie Pritchard, who is ideologically basically a tankie yet who actually engages in rational discourse (and who agrees with you on what to do with AI labs and data centers). My initial comment and first reply were not responses to you. I am annoyed by people who do not want to grapple with the world. You should separate my "socialism is bad, immoral, and ineffective" from my initial comment about many people not even trying. >Why not link a Standard Oil press release about why monopolies are great, actually? My point was that you might very well like OpenAI's proposals, if you were to read them! Because they may not actually be that far off from what you desire. They just …

Claude permanently raising weekly limits by 25%

Anthropic made critical decisions regarding compute and demand predictions which puts OpenAI in a much more healthy place. OpenAI have been reducing prices multiple times and increasing rate limits while also being generous with resets. Somehow enterprise, Anthropic is still ahead and I genuinely can't tell how or why? The models aren't that great (except Fable but has data retention issues). The prices are not that great. Claude Code is not as good as Codex. What gives?

Claude permanently raising weekly limits by 25%

Anthropic made critical decisions regarding compute and demand predictions which puts OpenAI in a much more healthy place. OpenAI have been reducing prices multiple times and increasing rate limits while also being generous with resets. Somehow enterprise, Anthropic is still ahead and I genuinely can't tell how or why? The models aren't that great (except Fable but has data retention issues). The prices are not that great. Claude Code is not as good as Codex. What gives?