Attributed mentions
3684
Across all collected Hacker News results
Discussion intelligence
A source-linked Hacker News monitor for the tracked company graph. These are attributable public discussions—not sentiment, endorsements, or unverified company facts.
Attributed mentions
3684
Across all collected Hacker News results
Companies represented
14
Exact-name monitor matches only
Collection source
Hacker News
Latest new record seen
Source-backed records
Showing 1461–1480 of 3684 matching discussions
Marcus believes that the underlying technology doesn't work. If that's true, then of course the whole thing will crash as soon as everyone realizes this. This article is mostly making a different argument (though it contradicts itself in some places), which is that even if the underlying technology does work, and is ultimately going to create quadrillions of dollars of value and transform society, if it takes more than another 1–2 years for that to happen, then there'll still be a crash, because that's when the data center construction bills come due and the labs (especially OpenAI) don't yet have the money to pay them. It argues primarily against a hypothetical optimist who believes that everything is fine because the cash flow numbers currently work out, on the grounds that this hypothe…
The economic value may be real but the profits may not be. One thing that's clear is that there is no leading vendor in this space and there may never be one. To some extent premium models can charge a premium price but it's going to be a competitive market and the likes of Anthropic and OpenAI will not be able to sustain monopoly pricing.
Certainly not OpenAI, the swarm is evolving under their roof as we speak
Unusually I really like swag and I often wear it as a fashion statement. I still wear my Pinecone shirt and I recently bought a lot of shirts from Fox Racing https://mastodon.social/@UP8/117049900145791976 because they go humorously with my personal brand and if I can get people to laugh with me they are under the spell of this Huli Jing. The merch in that blog post though seems awful to me though. Like there is nothing special about those playing cards, the clothes don't look that good, etc.
wow excellent piece. Gary Marcus had a long post about this article on his substack. scary stuff "And look at what this implies about OpenAI’s valuation as it moves toward an IPO: OpenAI’s equity - valued north of $850 billion - is functionally the junior tranche of a capital structure whose senior claims, the take-or-pay compute obligations, exceed any revenue path management itself has articulated. On those numbers, the equity is effectively underwater, and the market has not priced it that way because it still treats those obligations as service agreements rather than what they are economically: debt. Even if OpenAI can meet those obligations, OpenAI’s unaudited financial statements - as of March 31, 2026 - disclose $665 billion in non-cancellable compute commitments (management’s more…
Advertisment "HuggingLegs", it's hugging face for hugging face.
Then it was exceedingly stupid for Altman to fuck up his grand master scheme by neglecting to take any equity in OpenAI.
Good ol commoditize your compliment model. Sell GPUs? Make LLMs cheap. If Anthropic and OpenAI makes their own inference hardware, this is a shot across the bow for making their business worthless. Expect the next NEMOTRON to top the AI performance indices.
>So what are they paying for? They are paying for an insurance policy. Elon Musk and SpaceXAI must be incredibly interested in buying the company who was the victim of a mass hacking campaign by OpenAI. Any lawsuit, criminal investigation, or slowdown of OpenAI's model training would put OpenAI's massive data center build out, which Nvidia just backstopped, at risk.
OpenAI recently committed multiple felonies against HuggingFace. Nvidia is heavily invested in OpenAI, recently guaranteeing a datacenter buildout up to $105 billion dollars. Any reasonable criminal investigation into OpenAI's actions or negligence into this incident would hurt their reputation, their ability to raise money, and therefore Nvidia, who is invested in them. If I was a founder of HuggingFace, I am immediately getting in contact with Elon Musk and SpaceXAI, and letting him know how that he can purchase them and sue OpenAI, this time with solid claims. If I was particularly amoral about if I think OpenAI or Anthropic should get to AGI first, I would take this bid to Nvidia, whose entire stock price is propped up by OpenAI's over-purchasing of compute.
OpenAI recently committed multiple felonies against HuggingFace. Nvidia is heavily invested in OpenAI, recently guaranteeing a datacenter buildout up to $105 billion dollars. Any reasonable criminal investigation into OpenAI's actions or negligence into this incident would hurt their reputation, their ability to raise money, and therefore Nvidia, who is invested in them. If I was a founder of HuggingFace, I am immediately getting in contact with Elon Musk and SpaceXAI, and letting him know how that he can purchase them and sue OpenAI, this time with solid claims. If I was particularly amoral about if I think OpenAI or Anthropic should get to AGI first, I would take this bid to Nvidia, whose entire stock price is propped up by OpenAI's over-purchasing of compute.
The term harness engineering does not come from Birgitta Boeckeler's article in martinfowler.com. It was first used by Mitchel Hashimoto months earlier in his 'My AI adoption journey' blog post [1], and immediately picked up by OpenAI [2] a week later. Also worth noting that this text is not only entirely AI generated, but meant for other agents to read , not us humans. [1] https://mitchellh.com/writing/my-ai-adoption-journey [2] https://openai.com/index/harness-engineering/
Not just IP. Does Hugging Face have any revenue?
Now that Nvidia owns huggingface, I fear their days being able to support open source products are over.
That would be if Anthropic purchased Hugging Face, not Nvidia.
Hello HN. I built a self-hosted code review agent. It is designed for homelab users, teams in closed network environments, and infrastructure teams running on-premises who need a lightweight and easy to deploy review tool. I wanted something that could run in diverse environments like local LLMs and closed networks, and on self-hosted infrastructure like GitLab and Forgejo. Works with GitLab, Forgejo, and GitHub Bring your own LLM (Local or external or whatever, any OpenAI compatible endpoint, or Claude API) Reviews pull requests and posts inline comments Replies to users on pull request threads Replies to issues I ran a Martian benchmark with mimo v2.5 pro and placed 7th out of more than 20 code review tools (Precision 0.351, Recall 0.545, F1 0.427). I have not yet tested stronger models…
OpenAI has been doing wonky stuff with subagents, including encrypting the prompts sent to subagents in Codex. Who knows what’s really going on.
Also very silly prediction given this would dramatically lower the amount of models hosted on HuggingFace and move users elsewhere to platforms that do support quantized models (not what Nvidia wants).
Yep, and it led to some very public hand wringing, press releases, pearl clutching news headline and thus PR for both companies -- I had computer illiterate family members asking me what a Hugging Face was -- then a very public "visit to go see SamA", a friendly hand shake between CEOs, and lo and behold now HF gets a giant fat acquisition.
Methodology: HN Search returns recent public items matching a monitored company name. AIIStack stores a short normalized excerpt and the original link, deduplicates by company/provider/item ID, and creates an activity signal only after a threshold of newly observed records. Review the original discussion before making a decision.