Attributed mentions
2061
Across all collected Hacker News results
Discussion intelligence
A source-linked Hacker News monitor for the tracked company graph. These are attributable public discussions—not sentiment, endorsements, or unverified company facts.
Attributed mentions
2061
Across all collected Hacker News results
Companies represented
12
Exact-name monitor matches only
Collection source
Hacker News
Latest new record seen
Source-backed records
Showing 1781–1800 of 2061 matching discussions
They somehow forgot to mention that Hugging Face tried to use frontier models to analyze the attack but all models rejected. They had to use GLM 5.2 deployed locally. https://huggingface.co/blog/security-incident-july-2026
Why not complete the quote? > But among the errors and strange behaviour, Hugging Face warned the AI agents made brilliant technical moves and were able to rapidly adapt to new scenarios in the days-long hack.
Reading the code will not give you the same mental model as writing it. Sure you can catch some high level issues, but the brain is incentivized to skip over the lines which look like boilerplate. any issue in between boilerplate is going to be unnoticed. The original sin of the programming industry is not valuing expressive notation and expressive programming languages. (I am not talking about map/filter/reduce level party tricks but better metaprogramming and coherent abstractions). No amount of sacrificing tokens for Anthropicus is going to give you the same amount of understanding as writing the program.
I agree, at least in that we need more human contact, not less. But I will say Gemini / Claude have both been surprisingly good at understanding my half-assed attempts to put a complicated question into a coherent sentence.
The architectures are high level concepts and the mechanics usually have enough detail for you to try and implement. Transformers are very "mendable" in that you can permute the architecture in crazy or random ways, and still basically always end up with get a coherent LLM. The difference comes down to training efficiency, inference efficiency, and usually minor differences in performance. Hyperparams and stuff, I mean it's standard to do a sweep anyway.
You are completely off base with your assumption about what it costs to serve models. Nobody is gonna serve you K3 as cheaply as Anthropic is serving you Opus on any of their plans. Nobody has that kind of money to burn. Kimi does not even sell you a plan right now.
The only thing it might accomplish is allowing OpenAI / Anthropic to squeak out an IPO before the market realizes AI will become a commodity and the massive profits these companies are promising will never materialize. They aren't in denial about this open letter's futility in terms of actually reducing the pace of AI, that's just not their goal in the first place.
Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, No. 24-cv-05417 (N.D. Cal. June 23, 2025) Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc., No. 23-cv-03417 (N.D. Cal. June 25, 2025)
Anthropic has more than $20 million in revenue so as per the k3 license they would need to enter a special commercial deal if they wanted to use it: https://huggingface.co/moonshotai/Kimi-K3/blob/main/LICENSE
Even if they are distilling, I don't particularly care. Anthropic and others have been distilling copyrighted material by to build these models, largely without permission.
In this case, the term "uncomputable" also means "undefinable with less than infinite symbols". As in, not even computable in theory. It is isn't about normal "computable" concerns. It is "proven to never be characterizable". Which is a class of numbers whose "existence", if that can term can even be applied coherently for undefinable things, is contested, in theory. In practice they certainly do not exist. 1/3 has infinite decimal digits, but is definable with a finite number of symbols, so it is a computable real. Even if we had no algorithm yet to compute those digits. Try and define a specific number, that requires infinite symbols to define. As far as I am aware of, no part of calculus involves specific values that have no finite definition, except when the need for uncomputable…
Alternatively, Anthropic employees have basically unlimited token / model usage compared to you and I. Focusing on a better prompt is likely to get to the correct result faster than incomplete prompts and lots of "no change this ..." replies. Also, I've heard anecdotally that LLMs will underweight the earliest prompt text once context gets too long, so reminding the LLM of the most important aspects of the prompt seems to be perhaps valuable and certainly what lots of humans attempt.
The author of the article mainly talks about agentic programming, code generation, and reasoning. Ans very rightly identifies a big problem with agentic programming, in my experience. If developers can't maintain the software without AI, it's doubtful they can steer AI to maintain it either. Maybe this is not true and we can tell AI something like 'reduce the number of lines of code' until the essential software is exposed and pared down to a quantity and modularity that humans can then participate. No doubt, most of the value creation is outside of creating software. But if Nvidia and Anthropic do succeed in making better hardware and better software, then the positive reinforcement loop does seem like it could take off. And coding is a big part of that. Maybe we don't need to understand…
I can see how, if all you ever were exposed to was that link and this post, you might think they are equivalent, and the conclusion is "whatever, everyone is stealing from each other. But the answer is no, Claude didn't train itself on ChatGPT, but Kimi K3 did train itself on Claude. There has been no accusation that I am aware of by OpenAI against Anthropic, (which are in the same jurisdiction, so it would amount to legal action). On the other hand there have been accusations with extensive detail by Anthropic on how chinese models are attacking Anthropic to reverse engineer and copy their product. There's nuance if you care to see it, but maybe it's easier to pretend that everyone is ripping each other off so that you can consume a ripoff without seeing yourself as at fault.
I'm chinapilled now. Anthropic is an evil, enemy of humanity company that cannot be allowed to succeed.
Apparently there’s a proxy somewhere on github which munges it into an openai-alike api which you can then feed to those. May give it a shot if i’m bored soon.
... but that's since been refuted by https://huggingface.co/blog/agent-intrusion-technical-timeli... which says: > While the intrusion did reach Hugging Face's internal infrastructure, the only customer content accessed was the set of ExploitGym/CyberGym challenge solutions stored in five datasets.
Methodology: HN Search returns recent public items matching a monitored company name. AIIStack stores a short normalized excerpt and the original link, deduplicates by company/provider/item ID, and creates an activity signal only after a threshold of newly observed records. Review the original discussion before making a decision.