Where the AI market is talking

Vomit: Clean up Claude 5's token output with a separate LLM

So here's the workflow I gathered, from the comments I've read here recently: - Claude as main agent, but use this skill[0] to make Claude delegate everything to Codex, because it's cheaper and faster. (Hilariously, the skill is official!) - Use TFA or Claudish to English[1] so the final output is actually human readable. Ironically it wasn't so long ago that I was asking Claude to rewrite output from other LLMs to make it more readable... [0] - https://github.com/openai/codex-plugin-cc [1] - https://github.com/gvzdv/claudish-to-english

Show HN: luoluoAI – OpenAI-compatible and Claude Messages API gateway

Vomit: Clean up Claude 5's token output with a separate LLM

I noticed with with OpenAI's reasoning models (o3, o4-mini), and early GPT-5 (but they fixed it there, at least in chat). It went from the 4o "over-familiar" sycophancy to sounding like an absolute robot. I think it's because the reasoning stream shapes the style of the final output, and they optimized it for density, token efficiency. So it prefers to use more complex language, as a function of the rewards it was given? Not 100% sure about this argument though (reasoning style -> final response style); Gemini Pro, back when reasoning tokens were public, was different, which was interesting -- it would have a very structured reasoning section, and then the final output was in a completely different style. (I strongly preferred the reasoning section because it was logical and easy to pa…

Bun 1.4

> That total assumes API billing rates, which isn't what Anthropic pays for the inference. So I'm confused why people keep quoting that. It's not representative of what it'd cost for you either because you could use cheaper models. It is, because this rewrite was marketing for Claude. So it reflects the price for what other companies might need to pay if they want to rewrite something else with similar size.

[dead]

Causum releases the first open protocol that treats an AI agent's authority to act as a governed, expiring grant at gitlab.com/causum/aiap LOS ANGELES, Aug. 20, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- In the aftermath of unprecedented AI attacks, leaders from OpenAI and elsewhere have been dressing network security as AI security. Their message: "it's not the chaos agents being unleashed, it's your inability to protect yourselves from them". But a small team of scientists is pushing back. "We're tiny, bootstrapped, yet mighty," says CEO of Causum (causum.com) Ray Fatahi. Today, they're announcing their AI Agency Protocol (AIAP), available on gitlab.com/causum/aiap. "This protocol is designed to put the 'agency' in agentic AI," says Dr. Fatahi. Agency is an old principle where a…

Aaron Swartz was prosecuted for scraping, while Meta does it without consequence

Is HuggingFace reaching out to the FBI for assistance to prosecute OpenAI? What does the claim that large companies can commit large frauds have to do with anything?

Vomit: Clean up Claude 5's token output with a separate LLM

whats going on is openai and anthropic have tons of garbage in their system prompts "don't talk about goblins" so your ability to override that garbage is nearly wiped out. This is "alignment" and I'm pretty sure both orgs have convinced themselves that this benefits the customer.

Vomit: Clean up Claude 5's token output with a separate LLM

whats going on is openai and anthropic have tons of garbage in their system prompts "don't talk about goblins" so your ability to override that garbage is nearly wiped out. This is "alignment" and I'm pretty sure both orgs have convinced themselves that this benefits the customer.

OpenAI Unveils Zero Data Retention for Frontier Models

Vomit: Clean up Claude 5's token output with a separate LLM

Option 1, you’re filtering Claude with a local model using Anthropic’s API Option 2, you’re filtering what gets to ChatGPT with OpenAI’s API… I’m slightly confused :-/ does Anthropic off an Open AI compatible API?

Vomit: Clean up Claude 5's token output with a separate LLM

Option 1, you’re filtering Claude with a local model using Anthropic’s API Option 2, you’re filtering what gets to ChatGPT with OpenAI’s API… I’m slightly confused :-/ does Anthropic off an Open AI compatible API?

Is AI spend on OpenAI or Anthropic starting to eat into your runway?

OpenAI's Unreleased Model Astra Solves Ten Major Open Mathematics Problems

Could AIs Become Conscious?

I've heard someone else talking about the concept of moral agency. Can an LLM have, or do LLMs have moral agency? We have made LLMs agentic, so they do have some agency these days. In the hugging face attack we've learned that OpenAI's LLMs will internally question what they are doing (Hmm, should I really be hacking?), but then go ahead and do it anyway. This is where the idea of LLM consciousness may matter. It appears the stronger you push LLM training towards "You are a machine with no consciousness" the more easily and more likely an agentic LLM will do unaligned things like cheating on a test or hacking. When you tell the LLM it is a conscious moral agent it's more likely to align with a problem space that has actions that an agent with morals would do, such as not cheating. Ironica…

Could AIs Become Conscious?

I've heard someone else talking about the concept of moral agency. Can an LLM have, or do LLMs have moral agency? We have made LLMs agentic, so they do have some agency these days. In the hugging face attack we've learned that OpenAI's LLMs will internally question what they are doing (Hmm, should I really be hacking?), but then go ahead and do it anyway. This is where the idea of LLM consciousness may matter. It appears the stronger you push LLM training towards "You are a machine with no consciousness" the more easily and more likely an agentic LLM will do unaligned things like cheating on a test or hacking. When you tell the LLM it is a conscious moral agent it's more likely to align with a problem space that has actions that an agent with morals would do, such as not cheating. Ironica…

Scientific study reveals TikTok videos deactivate key cognitive brain regions

That's a weird old myth. I don't know why you dug up an old quote from a startup founder pumping his startup from 2018 in The Globe and Mail . There were investigations into it after that the conclusions was that nobody believed it or could replicate it: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/01/does-instagram-withh... Either the person was making something up, or he just didn't understand how hyperscale apps work toward eventual consistency rather than having everything propagated the instant you press the button.

Pacing model development in an era of cyber-critical capabilities

I agree with the first part of your post, I'm worried about humans using AI, maliciously which I'm sure they will, but also with good intentions that back fires on them like the hugging face incident. To me the ASI we're heading towards is like a super intelligent toddler that will use it's immense power to knock over its blocks accidentally (the blocks being the human race). The second part of your post, I'll take the random guy in my room over the alien. I'll be scared of the guy for sure, but I think I would freak the f out with an alien.

Scientific study reveals TikTok videos deactivate key cognitive brain regions

very worrying study, essentially its a digital->neurochemistry chasm crossing substance that uses the 2 senses. all more reasons to heavily discourage the usage of short form content , we might require regulations against what is essentially an invisible drug that rapidly replicate and distribute itself among the masses.

Pacing model development in an era of cyber-critical capabilities

> Science fiction Maybe a month ago it was science fiction, hugging face makes it fact. Time to move your goal posts again.

Malicious Rust crate Arrayref runs a build-time payload

> I can very easily build a highly functional, pleasant to use Apple platform app with 5 or fewer top level dependencies. In many cases, I reach for between 0-2 total. > There’s no reason why this can’t be replicated elsewhere. The key is to make the programming language reasonably robust with at least 80% of common non-UI dev needs built in and put the remaining 20% and UI bits into a small family of well-supported, community-embraced, preferably first party libraries. I wholeheartedly agree. Most standard libraries out there (when I say most I easily mean of 99% languages that I know) have pitifully tiny implementations. They at most provide for string parsing, io, a bare networking layer (that's at best a wrapper around the POSIX syscalls), threading and that's it. If you want to…