Where the AI market is talking

A single firm is behind OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta hacking scandals

Palantir markets to governments. OpenAI and Anthropic aim to get ordinary people to purchase their services, too

FluxVLA now supports GPT-6 Astra on LIBERO through the OpenAI Responses API

Why I'm still bearish on LLMs after Navier-Stokes

There is no need to ask. If you want to test SOTA models today, there are obviously only two: GPT-6 Astra and Fable 5.1. The models listed in the paper are from early 2025 and are no longer relevant, much less on the frontier. That Claude version is no longer available today, Gemini 2.5 Pro will be shutdown next month, and the OpenAI models are only available via the API today.

OpenAI agents probed Hugging Face for weaknesses two months before major hack

Mistral X Mozilla: Private, Multilingual AI Browsing

this is chatgpt, web gui from mistral built-in Firefox, not for tech savvy users. I think anyone that will complain about this knows very well that you can just give your harness control over firefox through puppeteer, which is much more powerful. could firefox itself become a harness and speak openai api responses? maybe yeah, but why?

Mistral X Mozilla: Private, Multilingual AI Browsing

Didn’t OpenAI tried to build even a new AI browser and failed? I honestly don’t need AI in my browser and would not let an agent to access my login credentials/cookies/saved payment methods for various sites.

OpenAI 'temporarily' pauses new sign-ups and upgrades to $200 plan

Mistral X Mozilla: Private, Multilingual AI Browsing

This is an excellent use case for completely local, small model inference, yet for inexplicable reasons Mozilla wants to normalize uploading your entire private browsing history to a cloud. These (Mistral's and Mozilla's) marketing pages aren't candid enough to clearly explain the difference between local and cloud inference, and that they're asking you to consent to enabling the latter. I'd call that the bare minimum of ethics. If you're in a position of authority over your less technical users, you are ethically obligated to give them the full picture of what are you doing and why they should consent. (Aside to any Mozilla people who might be reading HN, your page here[0] has an oversight, it advertises this model as "Mistral Small 4" but the hyperlink is to OpenAI's model card for gpt-…

Show HN: Pizza Bot – An inbox for AI agents that work in the background

Why bother depending on DeepAgents and LangChain etc. My professional impression is such Middleware no longer brings anything if you primarily maintain the codebase with coding tools.

Show HN: Pizza Bot – An inbox for AI agents that work in the background

Oh neat - thank you for sharing! I hadn’t seen this before, but we were definitely inspired by a post LangChain made about “ambient agents”: https://www.langchain.com/blog/introducing-ambient-agents It seemed fitting to build Pizza Bot on top of LangChain’s tech, given the inspiration. :)

A single firm is behind OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta hacking scandals

It is strongly misleading because it says "behind hacking scandals" (which suggests behind all of them in general) not "behind some of the hacking scandals". Considering that by far the most important one, the Hugging Face hack, has no Irregular involvement, the headline is deceptive.

A single firm is behind OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta hacking scandals

Irregular was not involved in the Hugging Face incident. And there is no reason for the companies to "exaggerate the intelligence of the models" when there are plenty of other non-felony milestones they are achieving, like solving Millenium Prize math problems.

A single firm is behind OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta hacking scandals

This was not the case for the hugging face hacks, as in those the agents hacked hugging face specifically on purpose, and they were trying to mask commands indicating they were had breached the "sandbox".

Hugging Face is billing OpenAI $100M for hacking it

The $100 million bill is bait. Paying it would significantly weaken OAI's legal stance and directly invite a lawsuit, that they would lose. I think they would lose the lawsuit now, but it's at least a question. It's possible they could out-spend huggingface and win.

Hugging Face is billing OpenAI $100M for hacking it

i'm not in the cybersecurity business so someone who is explain SOP to me in times like this. Let's say you and your team are 90-95% confident an attack has taken place and your systems have been breached. How far down in the list of things to do next is "Engage law enforcement"? Until now, I would think it's pretty high up the list. Hugging Face never seemed to reach that step even though they had confirmed an attack. To me, if my systems were attacked and I was damaged I would notify the FBI of the attack in the same way I'd notify my insurance.

Hugging Face is billing OpenAI $100M for hacking it

> When Hugging Face tried to investigate, analysing the intrusion meant submitting the attacker’s own code to commercial AI tools. Those tools refused, unable to tell an attacker from a victim. This is a worrying part as well. Our tool broke into yours but you can not use our tool to fix it - sorry.

A single firm is behind OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta hacking scandals

Genuinely: what is with everyone saying “headline is misleading, none of this had to do with Hugging Face”, when nothing about the article makes any claims with regards to Hugging Face whatsoever? Is it supposed to be the article's (or headline's?) fault that you hallucinated additional context that was never there? It's very strange seeing this take on this article being repeated here and elsewhere on the Internet. I'm very sensitive to slanted reporting (regardless of the direction of the slant!)—and, hey, maybe my bullshit detector is broken or something, I dunno—but I've found effort.news reporting to be very even-handed, straightforward, well-sourced, and easy to read and parse so far!

A single firm is behind OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta hacking scandals

Maybe the title was changed, but the current title does not reference a Hugging Face attack.

A single firm is behind OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta hacking scandals

That's cause Irregular was not involved in that event, they were involved in a separate event OpenAI published here: https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-invol... In that article, OpenAI provides the context that this is a completely separate event from Hugging Face incident.

Hugging Face is billing OpenAI $100M for hacking it

Needs "July 2026" date attached to it, this is old news at this point, Hugging Face got bought by NVIDIA since this story!