Attributed mentions
2105
Across all collected Hacker News results
Discussion intelligence
A source-linked Hacker News monitor for the tracked company graph. These are attributable public discussions—not sentiment, endorsements, or unverified company facts.
Attributed mentions
2105
Across all collected Hacker News results
Companies represented
12
Exact-name monitor matches only
Collection source
Hacker News
Latest new record seen
Source-backed records
Showing 1281–1300 of 2105 matching discussions
> This is a mind-blowingly clueless assertion. This is not a person capable of rationally assessing facts. At best this kind of writing is interesting as an artifict of human delusion and cognitive bias. How do you figure? This description would be best applied to you : * Musk both wildly wealthy because of his popularity and simultaneously incompetent * Musk and other investors have made boatloads of money off the promise that specifically american, boutique LLMs will deliver labor savings. in his case spaces, but it's indistinguishable from similar frauds such as eg openai, anthropic, etc * Musk's properties will likely collapse unless they can find new revenue or investors. Musk can only grift so many people before his bottom falls out
Anthropic's constant changing of its mind leads to instability which leads to unhappy customers
What amazes me is how, for a vibe coded product where all they have to do is use their AI to fix things ... NOTHING EVER GETS FIXED! I've probably gone to file 20 bugs. In all 20 cases there wasn't just one issue already filed for it: there were several, each which had a bunch of upvotes. And in all 20 cases ... every. last. one. ... Anthropic closed the ticket with no comment. IF YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE A SHITTY VIBE CODED PRODUCT, AT LEAST USE YOUR SHITTY AI TO FIX THE SHITTY PROBLEMS!
Anthropic is the new AWS. Amazon's first principle is the Customer Obsession. Making customers happy. Fun bit is that the human psychology rates personal looking fixes better than having no issues at all. For example, AWS overcharges you, you contact support, and more or less hassle free they refund or issue credits. The customer feels appreciated, or at least got something "extra" or "special treatment". Meanwhile, any other (small) cloud. Simple, no weird charges. Even _most_ of network egress is free. But, no reason to call support or feel "extraordinary". Comes out as "meh" against Amazon's "top tier" support model...
Yeah, but now we can hire the Chinese instead for 1/100th the cost. It's an even better deal. Plus we get to own, keep, run, do whatever with the model. We don't feel trapped. Moreover, it's something we can truly build on top of and own our own destiny. Anthropic and OpenAI are the new Oracle (Oracle pre-AI; Oracle is even worse now). Expensive, feels like dealing with a lawyer, and not at all open. They just became infinitely less cool than they were a month ago. The whole of our industry is going to migrate to open weights. We're smart enough to know this is the better deal and technical enough to be able to pull it off. The only thing that might save these OpenAI and Anthropic in the near-term is an abundance of enterprise contracts negotiated with non-tech companies. They'll soa…
Anthropic have a real fight on their hands now. The competition is no longer 6 months behind, it's 6 days. If this had come out two or three weeks earlier this would be an absolute market leader on both quality and timeline.
People keep saying this but from what we’ve seen, Anthropic models are marginally profitable and earn back their costs over their lifetime. The company is burning money building the next versions and other ventures (e.g. verticals), but the models themselves have been profitable.
There was an opportunity to organize and exploit market power back in 2017-2018, when there was a frenzy of recruiting and growth in the industry. The field was also much more ideologically coherent, in the wake of the first Trump election, than it is today. But nothing came of it. It's less clear that any similar opportunity exists today, or why it would come together now when it didn't under more favorable circumstances then.
The acronym is new to me: Facebook, Anthropic, Google, openAi?
You can't even pick 5.6 luna on the chat app with a paid subscription. It just gives you sol (or use older models) with what seems like basically as much usage as you want. And sol is considerably smarter than luna. All of this is of pretty minor importance though. You can't read as many tokens as a subcription can produce so more chat is not the value add nor super important. I mean there are literally so many providers for free chat if you are willing to use several seperate apps. The real value in these subs is using codex cli, much like the real point of anthropic subs is using claude code. Because agentic work actually does require a lot of tokens.
> an annoying personality I was with you until there. Qwen and the OpenAI models are great, aggressive agents, but they’re not as good as the anthropic models for human interaction. They just don’t have the subtlety, understanding, or attention to detail.
Location: Yerevan, Armenia Remote: Yes Willing to relocate: Yes Technologies: React, Node, Nest.js, Python, React Native, Expo, Tauri, Docker, Inngest, Pinecone, Qdrant, OpenAI API, LangChain, LangGraph Résumé/CV: https://github.com/oogxdd Email: ignatif@gmail.com
Location: Yerevan, Armenia Remote: Yes Willing to relocate: Yes Technologies: React, Node, Nest.js, Python, React Native, Expo, Tauri, Docker, Inngest, Pinecone, Qdrant, OpenAI API, LangChain, LangGraph Résumé/CV: https://github.com/oogxdd Email: ignatif@gmail.com
Location: Yerevan, Armenia Remote: Yes Willing to relocate: Yes Technologies: React, Node, Nest.js, Python, React Native, Expo, Tauri, Docker, Inngest, Pinecone, Qdrant, OpenAI API, LangChain, LangGraph Résumé/CV: https://github.com/oogxdd Email: ignatif@gmail.com
No one asks you to join a mob. I am complaining because your comments are not nearly a good faith and attempt to twist the topic into unrecognizable. At least make them coherent.
Funny, the same thing stuck out to me from Cloudflare OS's README ( https://github.com/cloudflare/cloudflare-os#contributing ): > At this time, we are not seeking outside contribution. > AI has made writing code easy. The hard part, today, is not writing the code, but reviewing it, making sure quality stays high, and keeping the product coherent. In that light, unfortunately, external code contributions are "donating" the easy part of the job, while creating more of the hard work. Feels very weird, but is logically sound: owners know exactly what they want and so they can work with Claude et al to iterate on features faster than with most drive-by contributors. It reads like an "end of an era" but I imagine the steady state will be somewhere in the middle: high t…
look at litestar [0] - if you want something more coherent than fast api [0]: https://litestar.dev
I think the one from hugging face is much clearer, albeit its an arena metric and a bit tricky to find the pareto view. Look for the the top Navigation Bar (Agent Chat Code Image Video). Chat -> (dropdown) Text -> (Side panel) View as Pareto. https://huggingface.co/spaces/lmarena-ai/arena-leaderboard
Methodology: HN Search returns recent public items matching a monitored company name. AIIStack stores a short normalized excerpt and the original link, deduplicates by company/provider/item ID, and creates an activity signal only after a threshold of newly observed records. Review the original discussion before making a decision.