Attributed mentions
3684
Across all collected Hacker News results
Discussion intelligence
A source-linked Hacker News monitor for the tracked company graph. These are attributable public discussions—not sentiment, endorsements, or unverified company facts.
Attributed mentions
3684
Across all collected Hacker News results
Companies represented
14
Exact-name monitor matches only
Collection source
Hacker News
Latest new record seen
Source-backed records
Showing 1301–1320 of 3684 matching discussions
> Anthropic and company (and several future companies) can become fantastically wealthy beyond anyone's dreams just by following claude code subscription model isn't the claude code subscription model heavily subsized and not profitable on its own?
Since the recent updates, I have the feeling that Claude Opus is becoming dumber on complex tasks. Things that used to work cleanly in a single prompt now fail completely. In coding workflows, it constantly ignores mandatory CLAUDE.md project rules, makes unsolicited edits to unrelated files, and breaks working code. It starts arguing based on stale comments, fails to update documentation when code changes, and edits based on blind guesswork instead of actually verifying the codebase first. I even caught myself using Fable for tasks that I always used Opus for in the past, just to get decent results. It feels like Anthropic is shifting their technical problems onto paying users. Either they are using strict safety filters that silently fall back to cheaper models without telling us, or th…
I won't defend the Trump admin, but I will quibble on Anthropic's efforts to be a good actor. It's easy to ask for regulation when you know it won't come (or you'll easily bear the token fines). It's easy to throw a few dozen million in a PAC when your valuation is in the trillions. It's easy to write a blog post about... anything. These aren't serious efforts. They also weren't working w/ the Biden admin in any meaningful way. But even if I granted the sincerity of their efforts to be a good actor, they've demonstrated that they can't be, and have now put us in an uncomfortable--extremely predictable, including and especially by them --position where we have the equivalent of a reactor meltdown. You can't be like "we think there's an unacceptable risk of a reactor meltdown, please f…
The models got good starting with 2026 and that isn't some attempt at excusing it. Companies like OpenAI started building dedicated models around their coding harness called Codex, there was gpt-5.3-codex and it was both cheaper and better at using the harness than the regular models. Then they started merging the two model types into their main release models. All of this happened like 6 months ago. You don't have to pay money to use Codex, there is a very generous free tier that costs you nothing, you just have to accept being told you're out of tokens every day. Because your token limits are low, you need to make sure that you accept or reject everything manually and when it tells you that it wants to run a command you have to paste in the command into your terminal and only paste the …
In this case, the argument is valid though. Only recently have some of the models become powerful enough (for some) to actually be useful in day to day programming, without too much hand-holding. For most, this change occurred with the introduction of Claude Opus, and OpenAI and Google have caught up. Unfortunately, none of the "open" models is at this level yet. The field is moving fast, and asking for scientific arguments is not realistic. It takes an extreme amount of effort to show what exactly is different. We were in a similar position with static vs dynamic typing for decades. There is still no scientific proof that one is better than the other, but it is quite obvious to professionals which flavor works better in a given situation. So, even though the argument might be sloppy, I s…
Yeah, It’s in the system prompt, Claude will tell you if you ask why it’s using Python. My theory is that Anthropic is just a vibe-coding company. Their goal is to capture the attention of white-collar non-coders, since programmers will jump ship fast to another model.
Anthropic can prevent people from using their models with the subscription plan outside Claude Code, why couldn't Spotify?
Until recently, I would have Occam's razor'd this and thought of a misconfiguration error from the military. Now, considering how the OpenAI/HF hack emerged out of nowhere, it might be possible that groups of AI agents might have done this even without any close human supervision.
Last update from Anthropic was that they only allow third party harnesses via extra usage credits or API key: https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/s/cNb55vmWqW
What's with all this AI spam for AI companies?! Seriously!? Every single hour on HN it's OpenAI does this, Gemini does that. It's all nothing. Extra reasoning. Big whoop.
But all models involved in the swarm attack were unreleased OpenAI models. Meanwhile HuggingFace had to use open models for defense/forensics after the breach was discovered. It seems like the public reaction is swinging towards (1) regulate OpenAI in particular because they are incompetently handling frontier development and (2) open models will be important for defense.
It's not. This article is weirdly light on details. The original source article from The Information apparently mentions that companies like OpenAI are buying them up to run RL. So it's yet another case of AI companies buying all the compute. * I say apparently because The Information wants you to sign up for access to the article, but I found this mentioned in multiple summaries of the article like this one [1]. [1]: https://tech-insider.org/openai-mac-buying-apple-supply-shor...
Methodology: HN Search returns recent public items matching a monitored company name. AIIStack stores a short normalized excerpt and the original link, deduplicates by company/provider/item ID, and creates an activity signal only after a threshold of newly observed records. Review the original discussion before making a decision.